RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck is a condition that arises due to incomplete obliteration of the processus vaginalis or an abnormal outpouching from the round ligament during fetal development. It usually presents as a painless, rarely painful, groin swelling. The definitive diagnosis for this condition is magnetic resonance imaging. Various management options have been proposed for this condition, including open surgery, transabdominal preperitoneal approach, totally extraperitoneal approach, and a combination of laparoscopic and open surgery. The present study highlights the benefits of the transabdominal preperitoneal approach when compared with the open anterior approach and addresses the intraoperative challenges faced during laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective study inclusive of 20 patients who underwent surgery for the hydrocele of the canal of Nuck from June 2019 to December 2023. Case records of patients were studied for information such as demographic features, type of pathology, the surgery performed, intraoperative challenges encountered, operative time, duration of hospital stay, scores from the visual analog scale pain assessment chart at various intervals, and time taken to return to work. The variables were documented and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The average age group of the study population was 27.8 ± 8.34 years. Of the 20 patients, 10 had undergone a transabdominal preperitoneal approach (Group A), and 10 had undergone an open anterior approach (Group B). Eleven out of 20 patients had an associated inguinal hernia, of which three were identified preoperatively and eight were identified incidentally during surgery. The mean operative time of Group A cases was 97.95 ± 7.54 minutes, while it was 66.3 ± 6.20 minutes for Group B cases. The Mann-Whitney U test showed a statistically significantly lesser operative time for Group B than for Group A (p-value < 0.001). The duration of hospital stays was comparable for the two groups with no significant difference (two days versus 3.8 ± 3.08 days, respectively). When the difference in the means of time taken to return to normal work was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test between Group A and B (6.1 ± 0.87 days and 11.2 ± 1.81 days, respectively), a statistically significant early return to normal work in the former group (p-value = 0.001) was revealed. Similarly, the Mann-Whitney U test when used to compare the median postoperative pain score of both groups at 12-24 hours, 48-72 hours, seven days, and three months showed a significantly lesser pain score among patients of Group A at all intervals (p-value < 0.001, p-value = 0.005, p-value = 0.005, p-value < 0.001, respectively). The incidence of intraoperative challenges, sero-hematoma, and surgical site infection were insignificant in comparison. CONCLUSION: The transabdominal preperitoneal approach for the hydrocele of the canal of Nuck is ideal as it offers excellent intraoperative delineation of pathology and postoperative outcomes. Prophylactic placement of a mesh in all cases can help prevent a future occurrence of inguinal hernia in these cases.
RESUMEN
Background Primary ventral hernias are abnormal protrusions of abdominal viscera through the areas of weakness in the fascia of the abdominal wall. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and complications, and the overall outcome in the Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) repair in the management of primary ventral hernias. Methods After obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance, this prospective comparative study between IPOM Plus and eTEP-RS was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from December 2020 to January 2022. A total of 50 patients presenting with primary ventral hernias were included in the study, of whom 25 underwent IPOM Plus and 25 underwent eTEP-RS repairs. Group selection was done by simple randomization using the lottery method. Patients more than 18 years of age with primary ventral hernias presenting with a hernial defect width less than 6 cm, consenting to the study, were included in the study. Patients who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, strangulated/obstructed hernias, recurrent/incisional hernias, connective tissue disorders, skin infections, enterocutaneous fistulas, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and parastomal hernias were exclusion factors. Results The mean intraoperative duration in the eTEP-RS group (192.3 ± 16.20 min) was significantly higher than in the IPOM Plus group (102.6 ± 16.78min, p=0.001). The mean duration of hospital stay in the IPOM Plus group (5.9 ± 2.19 days) was longer than in the eTEP-RS group (4.6 ± 3.17 days, p=0.02). The mean postoperative pain scores, from the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on days 1, 7, and 90 were 3.2 ± 1.11, 2.64 ± 1.11, and 1.68 ± 1.46 in the IPOM Plus group and 1.84 ± 0.688, 0.76 ± 0.66 and 0.08 ± 0.40 in the eTEP-RS group, respectively (p=0.001). Conclusion Despite being a technically easy procedure requiring less intraoperative time, IPOM Plus had several disadvantages, such as increased postoperative pain, longer duration of hospital stays, higher chances of wound site seromas, and higher rates of postoperative paralytic ileus. On the other hand, eTEP-RS was a more challenging procedure requiring more intraoperative time; however, it had several advantages: less postoperative pain, less duration of hospital stay, early recovery, and fewer chances of seromas and paralytic ileus. However, more robust data is required to compare and validate the differences between both procedures' short- and long-term outcomes.
RESUMEN
Introduction Emergency surgery has a high risk of complications due to the detrimental effect of perioperative sepsis and the relative lack of preoperative optimization of patients. Despite advances in critical care for the management of sepsis, its prevention is dependent on various patient and surgeon factors. Surgical site infection continues to be a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following emergency abdominal surgery, especially in contaminated or dirty wounds. This study aims to compare two techniques of abdominal wall closure, primary closure with subcutaneous suction drains and delayed primary closure following negative pressure wound therapy, in terms of incidence of surgical site infection and morbidity. Materials and methods The study was a prospective comparative study including 50 patients with an acute surgical abdomen requiring laparotomy. The patients were randomized into two groups, Group A (n=25) who underwent primary closure, and Group B (n=25) who underwent delayed primary closure. In Group B patients, a vacuum-assisted closure device was applied in the subcutaneous space for five days prior to the closure of the skin. Outcomes were compared in terms of the incidence of superficial and deep surgical site infection, its association with diabetes mellitus, and the total duration of hospital stay. A chi-square test and an unpaired t-test were used for the test of significance. Results A total of 50 patients, comparable in age, were included in the study. The overall incidence of surgical site infection was significantly higher in patients of Group A as compared to Group B (p=0.0046). There was a positive correlation between diabetes mellitus and the occurrence of wound infection in both groups with the odds ratio being 2.67 and 2.38 respectively. The incidence of superficial wound infection was significantly higher in Group A when compared to Group B (52% versus 24%; p=0.04). Deep surgical site infection was higher in patients of Group A (20% versus 8%) but was not statistically significant (p=0.22). The average duration of hospital stay was 41.56 ± 6.96 and 37.86 ± 6.68 days for patients who developed complications from Groups A and B respectively, while it was nearly two and a half times lower in uncomplicated cases of Groups A and B (11.71± 1.70 days and 16.58± 1.06 days respectively). The one-tailed unpaired t-test showed a significant difference in means of hospital stay between patients with and without complications (T: 17.06, critical value: 1.677). Conclusion Delayed primary closure is an effective method of managing contaminated and dirty wounds following emergency laparotomy. Negative pressure wound therapy is one technique for preventing wound bed infection and accelerating wound healing in such cases. By combining the above in emergency surgeries, the incidence of surgical site infection and duration of hospital stay can be significantly reduced.
